my-sfw-ships:

felina-marlena-vasquez:

potbellies:

darth-darling:

panic-volkushka:

trying-really-hard-ok:

panic-volkushka:

Clients’ names and personal information have been omitted to retain their privacy.

“That boy ain’t right.”

There’s more to abuse than hitting.

tbh, I was kinda waiting for someone to point this out and yes, you’re absolutely right. Abuse doesn’t have to be physical, it can be emotional and/or verbal.

This comic came about because I‘d read several commentaries comparing Homer Simpson and Peter Griffin, specifically in regards to how they treat their daughters.

Almost everyone I know who takes the time to think critically about The Simpsons or Family Guy hones in on the fact that Peter physically and emotionally abuses Meg, whereas Homer is incompetent, neglectful, and absolutely does not understand Lisa – but he loves her and he tries.

In the commentary about how Peter and Homer treat their daughters, I didn’t really see anyone bring up the physical/emotional abuse of their sons.

To lay it out there – I loathe Family Guy. Fucking hate it.

I grew up watching The Simpsons and can have entire conversations purely through quoting the show. But as much as I love The Simpsons, I think the overall cultural attitude to corporal punishment (physical abuse) has changed enough that it’s time to retire the running “joke” of Homer choking Bart. It may have been a culturally acceptable joke ten years ago, but more and more research is showing seriously negative outcomes for kids that have experienced any form of physical punishment. We need to stop normalizing it.

As for King of the Hill, Hank and Peggy are hardly perfect parents and both have a tendency towards stifling Bobby’s more flamboyant and/or “feminine” behavior. But they both love Bobby; they have both, at different times during the show, been able to connect to Bobby through his various interests. While not perfect, they are a much healthier depiction of a family.

As a queer transgender dude who grew up in Texas and is totally unsuited for Southern concepts of masculinity, I have a real soft spot for King of the Hill and for Bobby. It’s a far more real and complex depiction of family, compared to the pointless cruelty of Family Guy or the lesser cruelties of The Simpsons.

“That Boy Ain’t Right” Hank said this a lot, but if I remember correctly, he’s never said this to Bobby’s face. He doesn’t understand him sometimes, but he’s never treated him like Homer and Peter have.

Another thing on Hank. A big part of the show is Hank learning to be a good father while dealing with his experiences with his own shitty, racist, abusive father. If Hank has a scene where he is extremely uncomfortable, it’s almost entirely with showing emotions. When someone is crying or upset around him (Peggy, Luanne, Bobby, John Redcorn, Bill, etc) he shuts down because that’s what his father molded him into.

And by the end of the series you see him behave differently. He learns to be openly romantic with his wife (even having sex on a freaking train), he deals with his father’s issues, HE DRESSED IN DRAG IN FRONT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD FOR BILL, and most importantly he learns that his son will always be “different” and gets over his own unease so that Bobby can be happy. Hank’s a good dad on the pure measure that he tries and that’s damn more than Peter or even Homer.

But Bob Belcher will always be #1 dad anyways.

I’m glad I searched the notes long enough to find this addition since it’s great and covers all the issues I failed to word myself because I just can’t words sometimes.

Worth a reblog just for the commentary.

jf-madjesters1:

           
                       
                   
               
                               
                    
Comic/Art by JF-madjesters1 2016 

Do not repost. Thank you.

Base on a small short story that I told my niece
one time during Halloween. She liked the story very much. Maybe you guys will like it
too. Dedicated to my niece who always inspires me and demands lots of stories from me.

Happy Halloween Holidays! 😀

theroguefeminist:

oleanderwasp:

mikedawwwson:

mikedawwwson:

That’s Not Who We Are

Was suprised to find out this strip had been nominated for an Ignatz award this morning. I was not expecting that, and I am beyond honored to have been considered. Thankyou to Matt Bors and The Nib for commisioning it from me, and thankyou to Eleri Harris my wonderful editor.

this comic is all over the fuckin place. whats the point its trying to make? that because of something from a century ago we should let thugs lash out at random people in the street and get away with it? 

The point of the comic is that the race issues today are directly connected to our country’s history with race. The attitudes many white people have now are simply a remixed version of racist attitudes of the past. A white person in the 60’s called Martin Luther King a communist and trouble maker for leading peaceful protests. Today, you dub Black Lives Matter protesters thugs, which has become a racially-charged epithet. The point is that in every era, many white people can find a reason to criticize Black activist movements, but at the core the criticism is the same: that the activists are inconveniencing them, are not being nice enough or polite enough. You keep going back in history and you see the same attitudes just in different words until you get back to slavery, when Black people had very little power to protest their degradation. Then you get to Obama’s statement–the claim many liberal Americans have made in response to modern day racism: that this racism goes against American ideals. But unfortunately, there is no point in American history when our country was free of racism. It has always been here.

Thus, when Obama claims that this isn’t who we are as a nation, Trump supporters can say this is exactly who we are. The racism that has been intensifying in recent years in the form of higher rates of hate crimes, white supremacist rallies, white supremacist provocateurs like Milo Yiannopolous gaining prominence, and the election of a president who engaged in racist rhetoric throughout his campaign are not random events that came from nowhere. They constitute backlash in response to progress in racial equality in our country, backlash that springs from racist attitudes and values that have existed as long as America has existed. Your statements would fit very seamlessly in this comic as a dialog in a word bubble of white commentators in 2017. Had you lived in a different time period and held the same attitudes, you’d be saying the same things as the other white people in the comic.

The question we can all ask ourselves in any time period is what side of history will we be on? In future generations, we look back on former expressions of racism with disdain, but it’s easy to overlook our own iteration of the same. If you call Black Lives Matter activists thugs in 2017, you would gave opposed MLK’s movement in the 60’s. The fight that’s being fought today is the same that was being fought then. If you say “it was different then–Black people had real problems, but now racism is solved and they should be happy with what they get” or “the Black people back then fought for their rights the RIGHT way, but the ones today are too aggressive” or “nowadays it’s white people who are actually oppressed” then you are LITERALLY using all the same talking points critics of the riots in the nineties, opponents of MLK, proponents of Jim Crow, etc used back in the day. There are texts in which white people complain of reverse racism over one hundred years ago–would you agree that Black people had advantages over whites over a century ago? Of course not, that would be absurd. But some white people really felt that way then, and some feel that way now.

Looking back, future generations will see your rhetoric the same way we see anti-MLK rhetoric or pro-slavery rhetoric. The goal is to have more insight than the age you live in, to see injustice in the world right now and fight on the right side. Consider how the injustice we see so clearly in the past was not clear to many people then. Couldn’t the same be true now? Try to think about the situation from the perspectives of the people out there protesting. Why are they angry? Why are they hurt? Why are they afraid? What are they fighting for? Are they just “thugs” stirring up trouble, or are they like activists in the past, drawing attention to inequality and injustice, fighting a fight as old as America, older even, for greater equality, greater justice? Are the people opposed to them part of a long legacy of racism? A story hundreds of year in the making? What role will you play in the story? Will you be someone who fights for justice, or who obstructs equality for all?

zombeesknees:

so if y’all aren’t familiar with the comic series beasts of burden yet, i highly recommend you check it out. it’s about a group of dogs (and one cat) who fight the forces of evil (witches, vengeful spirits, frog demons, zombie pets) in a picturesque neighborhood. they’re normal dogs who learn magic and fight monsters – what’s not to love? also, this series will absolutely rip your heart out (“a dog and his boy” and “lost” are particularly heart-crushing installments) but it’s totally worth it.

@pmechanicstudies @wellthatsjustspooky

lookiamnotcreative:

4-page promotional preview of 

怪談囃子, a short manga appearing in the October issue of Bunch Magazine! COMING SOON TO ONLINE ORDERS NEAR YOU.

I lol’d when I saw this on twitter, so I lunchbreak translated it here. Usual shit wording apologies and caveat emptors apply.

(The source is here. This is only a sample and it’s for promotional purposes, so it should be fine to do this…?)

@wellthatsjustspooky